#Persepolis transcript franais manual#
#Persepolis transcript franais full#

At Tang-e Borāq shooting conditions were better, for the king could position himself to face both cairns, which explains why it was necessary to move the target at Hājiābād to make it visible. Although badly deteriorated in its Middle Persian version, the inscription was well understood after Gropp by MacKenzie, who showed that the Parthian version differed very little from the original. Discovered in 1956, this inscription was first mentioned by ʿAli Sāmi (19), then published by Gerd Gropp in 1969, in a volume in which Walter Hinz also presented various discoveries. This exploit, which appeared difficult to understand properly from a short text of only fourteen lines in Parthian and fifteen in Middle Persian, must have made a powerful impression on the court and beyond it for the king had both versions of the inscription engraved at another site about a hundred km northwest of the first, at Tang-e Borāq in an identical archeological context, on the rock of a grotto. The king thereupon ordered a second cairn to be set up in a certain direction, and challenged anyone strong enough to shoot an arrow to reach that cairn. In the presence of kings and princes, of the grandees and the nobles, the king of kings had shot an arrow beyond a cairn which was not visible and yet constituted the target, which he reached nevertheless.

#Persepolis transcript franais full#

This text describes a feat of archery by King Šāpūr I, mentioning his full titles to start with. Drawing of the Ḥājiābād inscription published by Robert Ker Porter (I, pl. MacKenzie published (1978), together with a silver plate reproducing part of the Ḥājiābād inscriptions, a transliteration, transcription, and translation of the two versions, which, together with Nyberg’s study, made up the editio princeps of the text.įigure 1.

#Persepolis transcript franais manual#

The author, however, provided a facsimile text in his Manual of Pahlavi (1964), and Walter Bruno Henning added some minor corrections to the Parthian version, which he called the “ fons et origo Parthian studies.” And finally, David N.

These appeared in the Festschrift for Arthur Christensen, but were written in Swedish and hence not widely accessible. Following several attempts at deciphering them, it was not until a century later that Ernst Herzfeld (1924) provided a transcription of them in his edition of the Paikuli inscription, and not until 1945 that Henrik Samuel Nyberg for the first time provided a complete edition of both the Parthian and Middle Persian versions.

The Hajiabad inscriptions were discovered by Robert Ker Porter at Ḥājiābād in 1818 in a grotto a few kilometers north of Persepolis, at a place called Šayḵ ʿAli or Tang-e Šāh Sarvān, opposite the village of Ḥājiābād that gave these texts their name (Figure 1).